A good professor or lecturer can be reasonably strict, but Airlie Heung is unreasonably restrictive. No creativity, no critical thinking, no sophistication. She asks so much from her students but does not seem to care so much about how she teaches and what she delivers.

I feel very sorry for my classmates who score even lower than me -- it's not their problems, it's Airlie Heung, who looks down on her own students.

佢係一個二十幾歲的香港女老師。本來意為年輕老師會有熱忱, 上堂冇咁悶。點知佢除咗冇經驗, 教學心態同手法都好有問題, 一定唔好選呢個老師。
我哋第二日正式上堂(第一堂玩破冰活動), 冇人知道要print 網上的文章, 佢就大駡我哋話用電腦同手機睇討論唔到, 要我哋print曬。結果我同好多人都print曬所有文章,結果佢用咗幾堂就冇用。浪費我哋printing quota同地球資源, 仲要唔明點解要比佢吠咗成十分鐘, 真心想問佢有冇plan過點教書。
我哋交文之前佢都歡迎我哋send email or facebook 揾佢, 呢點都算係盡責。但佢上堂真係太盡責, 有一堂係只係返去同老師討論下個draft的, 其他班的人都會由老師分配時間返去, 人哋返三分鐘, 我哋就返成堂三個鐘, 在後面呆等。個老師為咗唔好令我哋冇野做, 就比份野我哋做, 份野不但冇用, 佢仲要唔收來改, 做咗等於冇做。
最無奈係最後一堂present, 佢要我哋早半個鐘返去, 9點堂變8點半堂,咁都算了。人哋班班都可以準時, 我哋配合曬佢要求, 用USB開info graphic, 唔使上網入password, 但最後都仲要唔係準時落堂,佢時間控制能力完全係零。
總括而言, 佢教學內容普普通通, 但教學能力很有進步空間, 現階段都係唔好選呢個老師做白老鼠為妙。
唔評論我成績, 但以上所言都句句屬實。
利申: year 1, 英中畢業, dse英文4

上堂努力D就得啦
可能我可以拎A同我FINAL PRO.有關
輕鬆19/20